Answer:
When it comes to savings, a higher interest rate is the name of the game. It means a better return on your money. The interest rate is what the bank will pay you for the privilege of keeping your money.
Explanation:
For example, it’s not uncommon to get a .01% interest rate on a traditional savings or checking account, while interest rates on high-yield savings accounts can range anywhere from 1% to 1.35%. Here’s how that difference plays out in real life based on a balance of $10,000 after one year, assuming no additional deposits.
Type of savings account /Interest rate/ Balance after one year (based on
monthly compounding)
High-yield savings account/ 1.35% / $10,135.84
Traditional savings account/ .01% / $10,001
That’s a difference of about $135 a year — nothing to scoff at — but that gap starts to widen the minute you make monthly deposits to boost your savings.
For example, if you made $100 monthly deposits — the equivalent of $1,200 a year — your year-end monthly balance on the low-interest savings account would be $11,201.06, compared to $11,343.29 with a high-yield savings account. Over time, this adds up.
Answer:
This is an excerpt from the epic poem Beowulf.
Explanation:
Beowulf is an epic anglo-Saxon poem that tells the story of the hero Beowulf, a warrior and honorable prince who has the greatest strength ever seen in a man, his strength is superhuman which allows him to participate in countless battles without suffering any damage, as well as causing a lot of dread in your enemies.
Because of all this power he possesses, he decides to travel and save a population from a showy creature that is the real evil, a terrible being that eats whole men, called Grendel.
In the excerpt shown in the question above, we can see Beowulf claiming that he will battle Grendel and free the population from his attacks.
C) The phrase creates an image of people walking through several inches of trash, which implies a filthy environment. The entire text is talking about how dirty it is and how it is hard to walk through with all the trash and filth in the way.
Answer:
thesis statement⇒ supporting content⇒ conclusion
This is very interesting. I don't remember it at all, and I should. However, I think there is an answer.
First there is Boxer's reaction. He had a very pragmatic view of what the bank notes meant. If you can't eat them, of what value are they? They seem an awful trade to him: at least the timber had use.
So he doesn't like the deal, but the pigs are the masters and no one argues with them.
It isn't D. Fredrick is a louse. He will deceive anyone if there is gain for him in it.
Napoleon really isn't deceitful in this passage. He is very vain. C is not quite right, but it maybe your best answer.
I don't see what B has to do with anything.
A historically has not been proven to be true. Tread carefully around a dictator. They can do you a great deal of damage. Mao for example did not seek approval: he demanded it and he killed millions getting that approval. Same with Stalin.
It is either A or C. A is true of Napoleon. It is not true of the worst dictators of the last century. C doesn't seem to fit, but I can't get rid of it. The answer is between those two. You are going to have to pick or choose one of the other two. I'd pick A myself, but I'd sure be holding my nose.
