Which statement best explains how the authors develop their claim across the two passages? Both passages show the historical det
ails that led the abolitionists to support the American Revolution. Both passages develop the idea that boycotting could bring attention to people who were treated unfairly, including enslaved people. Both passages support the claim that intelligent people will overcome harmful governments. Both passages show that there was little connection between the sugar trade and the rise of slavery in North America.
The correct answer is <u>(B) Both passages develop the idea that boycotting could bring attention to people who were treated unfairly, including enslaved people.</u>
Explanation:
Got it right on Edge!
Normally I don't ask because I feel like its a little rude but can I have brainliest I've never had a brainliest answer. Check my profile just in case you don't believe me.
It would be rainsford falling off the yacht because at that point you wouldn't know what is going to happen and that eventually turns into a series of events.
