1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinvika [58]
3 years ago
12

Which statement best explains how the authors develop their claim across the two passages? Both passages show the historical det

ails that led the abolitionists to support the American Revolution. Both passages develop the idea that boycotting could bring attention to people who were treated unfairly, including enslaved people. Both passages support the claim that intelligent people will overcome harmful governments. Both passages show that there was little connection between the sugar trade and the rise of slavery in North America.
English
2 answers:
o-na [289]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the correct answer is B .

Explanation:

edge2020 .

have a gr8 day mate .!

RSB [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is <u>(B) Both passages develop the idea that boycotting could bring attention to people who were treated unfairly, including enslaved people.</u>

Explanation:

Got it right on Edge!

Normally I don't ask because I feel like its a little rude but can I have brainliest I've never had a brainliest answer. Check my profile just in case you don't believe me.

You might be interested in
How should the writer punctuate the underlined nonrestrictive clause in order to emphasize it?.
mafiozo [28]

After reading the original sentence, we can select the following option when it comes to how the writer should punctuate the nonrestrictive clause to emphasize it:

D) My brother—who is a superb actor—will audition tomorrow for a film role.

<h3>What is a nonrestrictive clause?</h3>
  • A nonrestrictive clause is a type of relative clause that provides nonessential information about a noun in a sentence. Being a relative clause, it begins with a relative pronoun (who, which, etc.).
  • Nonrestrictive clauses should always be set off by commas. For example: Jane, <u>who is our best employee,</u> has finally decided to have a baby.
  • However, if a writer wishes to give the nonrestrictive clause some more emphasis, the best way to do it is by using dashes. For example: Jane - <u>who is our best employee</u> - has finally decided to have a baby.

With the information above in mind, we can choose letter D as the best option.

The complete question is as follows:

My brother who is a superb actor will audition tomorrow for a film role.

How should the writer punctuate the underlined nonrestrictive clause in order to emphasize it?

A) My brother: who is a superb actor will audition tomorrow for a film role.

B) My brother; who is a superb actor; will audition tomorrow for a film role.

C) My brother who is a superb actor, will audition tomorrow for a film role.

D) My brother—who is a superb actor—will audition tomorrow for a film role.

Learn more about nonrestrictive clauses here:

brainly.com/question/977724

7 0
2 years ago
Why is On the Origin of Species described as "one long argument"?
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

It presents an oplnion supported by reasons.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence is grammatically correct? “The managers who run the restaurant insists that he is not eligible for medical covera
sdas [7]

Answer:

The <em><u>managers</u></em> who run the restaurant<em><u> insist</u></em> that he is not eligible for medical coverage.

Explanation:

subject-verb agreement  (plural subject and plural verb)

3 0
2 years ago
The answer for this was he tries to score goals instead of helping the goalie block shots
sashaice [31]

Answer:

yep

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read the passage and answer the question.
bixtya [17]

We can actually infer here that the character the speaker is referring to in this passage is: Telemachus.

<h3>What is inference? </h3>

Inference is actually known to be a conclusion that one reaches or arrives to after much evaluation, observation, consultation and experimentation. Inferences, in other words are known to be conclusions. When we make inferences, we actually arriving at a conclusion which is actually based on observation already carried.

We can actually see here that examining the passage and speaker, we can actually deduce and infer that the speaker is making reference to Telemachus.

"The Journey of Odysseus" is known to be written by Homer. When Telemachus reached the shores of Ithaca, he rushes to Eumaeus. This was carried as a result of the instruction by Athena.

Learn more about Odysseus on brainly.com/question/1116075

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Help me to answer all this, please
    14·1 answer
  • Idea on reaserch paper about social issues
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the best definition for adjective?
    9·1 answer
  • Help ........................
    5·1 answer
  • The bow of God's wrath is bent . . . it is nothing but the mere pleasure of God, and that of an angry God, without any promise o
    5·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of chapter 4 of 'into the wild' by jon krakaeur
    6·1 answer
  • What does "prior knowledge," as it is used in predicting, mean? A. Everything that I have ever learned c. Knowledge I was born w
    14·1 answer
  • SOMEONE HELP ME NOW PLZ
    6·2 answers
  • Plssss hleppp me on number 13 and 14
    10·2 answers
  • As you're listening to a speech, what should you be thinking about?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!