Answer:
Explanation:
The tactics of the Sarissa Phalanx holding the line while cavalry and mobile infantry flanked and routed the enemy is why Alexander was so successful. It worked against every enemy of that era. The phalanx, the sarissa along with the tactics used all undoubtedly contributed to the success of Alexander's army.
When he published the results of his<span> experiments in the French journal Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences </span>in 1900<span>, he neglected to mention Mendel's </span>work<span>, but after criticism by </span>Carl Correns<span> he conceded Mendel's priority. </span>Correns and Erich von<span> Tschermak now share credit for the rediscovery of Mendel's laws.</span>
For Italy, they were spies who collected top secret knowledge for the Allied Powers. They were U.S. soldiers who fought off the enemy successfully. They were British troops leaving their units to join the enemy.
<span>When it comes to what happened to the people's culture with migration patters, the answer is that as the people migrated the spread culture through diffusion. This means that their cultures mixed and new cultures were made by having cultures diffuse and mix and adopt elements of other cultures, but they would also lose some parts of their own that would get lost in time. </span>
Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.
<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.
The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.
