Scientists routinely explore whether two different animal species have evolved from a recent common ancestor.Comparisons of items eaten for food is the LEAST useful technique to help with this determination
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The features that are related to the anatomy of two organisms when they share them in common indicates that they are evolved from the common ancestor. When there exists a common feature between any two species physically then it is inherited form the common ancestor.
The two species having common traits involves similar genetic material called DNA, genetic codes that are similar and same translation and transcription process. Thus studying about genes and gene expression will be helpful to explore whether two different animal species have evolved from a recent common ancestor than including the studies related to Comparisons of items eaten for food.
I'm pretty sure it's the third option.
Answer:
A choosing to burn coal to generate electricity
Explanation:
Neither nuclear energy nor alternative sources such as wind and solar seem likely to meet the demand for electricity. ... Of all fossil fuels, coal puts out the most carbon dioxide per unit of energy, so burning it poses a further threat to global climate, already warming alarmingly.
Answer:the one on the left is a old worm
Explanation: the one on the right is a young worm
The most specific category and level shared by humans, gorillas, and howler monkeys (from the new world) are Suborder Anthropoidea.
<h3>
What is suborder Anthropoidea?</h3>
Anthropoidea is a suborder of primates that includes humans, gorillas, and monkeys. Anthropoids are larger than prosimian primates and have flatter, more human-like faces. They also have larger brains.
Unquestionably apes, dryopithecines lived in the following Miocene. According to the conventional palaeontological theory, these Miocene apes gave rise to three new lineages in turn, one of which led to gibbons, another to big apes, and the third to humans.
However, it has long been held that the ancestors of both gibbons and orang-utans diverged from the ancestral line of the advanced Primates at an early date and that this line only later split into two groups, one of which included humans and the other of which included the gorilla and the chimpanzee; recent palaeontological evidence now tends to support this second view.
To learn more about suborder Anthropoidea, visit:
brainly.com/question/14390214
#SPJ4
