Answer:
Shel Silverstein
Explanation:
An antecedent can be regarded as thing that stand in place of a word that is been used previously. When a pronoun is used in reffering to a particular thing earlier in a sentence (
antecedent). There should be agreement in term of numbers i.e singular/plural with what it's reffering to.
Therefore, the antecedent of the pronoun " her" is Shel Silverstein
Answer: Cassie’s father wants Cassie to think carefully before taking a stand about Lillian Jean
Explanation:
Cassie’s father had a serious talk with Cassie as he wants her to think carefully before taking a stand about Lillian Jean.
This can be deduced from the excerpt when he told her not to get mad but that she should clear her head and think sensibly so as to know whether Lillian Jean is worth taking a stand about or not.
The correct answer is: Option A. The appeal praises the virtues of the writers of the document Taney uses as evidence.
The appeal consists of a set of virtues deticated to those who are responsible for the declaration. Nothing but admiration is delivered to these writers from the speaker, praising their literacy, honorable behaviour, and staying true to their own values.
The appropriate response is contextual perspective. It alludes to the investigation of living beings connecting in and with an authentic and current situational setting. It is an approach in light of contextualism, a reasoning in which any occasion is translated as a continuous demonstration indivisible from its present and authentic setting and in which a drastically useful way to deal with truth and significance is received.
The opening scene of the play “Julius Caesar” opens with the conversation between Flavius and Murellus and a cobbler. They were enquiring the cobbler for not working on the day of work. The witty and punning remarks of the cobbler made the two blow out their rage at him. The cobbler said to them that he wanted to enjoy and celebrate the victory of Julius Caesar who had defeated Pompey. Flavius and Murellus commented on the fickle nature of the cobbler as until the last time these people were the one who celebrated the victory of Pompey and now was busy in celebrating his defeat. But according to the cobbler, he was not celebrating the defeat of Pompey but the victory of their new ruler Julius Caesar. Flavius and Murellus and the cobbler differed in this opinion about celebrating the defeat of victory.
