Answer:
Civil society comprises organizations that are not associated with government including schools and universities, advocacy groups, professional associations, churches, and cultural institutions (business sometimes is covered by the term civil society and sometimes not).
Explanation:
The answer is <span>Acquiescence. This</span> is a group of response prejudice in
which defendants to a survey have an inclination to agree with all the
questions or to show a positive connotation. So in the question,
when Elmer told Lilah was a spoiled brat, Lilah thought was true so in that
case she agreed with Elmer. This response also referred to as
"yea-saying" and is the inclination of a respondent to approve with a
statement when undecided.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Two ways in that presidents can control their approval with the public more directly are the use of mass media and social media to influence the public opinion of American citizens and the decisions he makes in favor of the American people that create direct benefits for them.
These methods affect their decision-making processes as head of the Executive branch in that sometimes the decisions made are only thought to improve their public image and popularity, not really resolving important issues in the country that need to be addressed seriously.
Many times, public relations and media advisors just think about how to favor the popularity of the US president, instead of inviting him to face the toughest issues that affect the citizens.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Causation".
Explanation:
- Any variable that has the power to influence another is Causation. The very first variable may produce the secondary or may induce variations in the frequency of the 2nd factor.
- This means that one occurrence is the product of the occurrence of those other events; i.e. between both the two events, there is indeed a causal relation.
Therefore, Causation is the right answer.
Answer: He lacked the specific intent necessary for burglary because he believed that the bookie owed him the money.
Explanation:
Gambling can turn out sour sometimes, especially when results come out controversial. Although the defendant is not supposed to break into someone's home but according to the common law burglary he has some defense to make for himself which is he believed that the bookie owed him the money that's what he based his action for. The definition of common law burglary requires that the defendant break into the dwelling place with the intent to commit a felony. He would claim he didn't destroy any item or take more than what He was owed but just stocked to taking the money he was owed.
