1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nika2105 [10]
3 years ago
15

Why did the U.S. take the land back that had been promised to the Native Americans in the Black Hills region of North and South

Dakota?
a.
The U.S. wanted to show its power over Native Americans.
b.
The U.S. wanted to keep Native Americans farther away from settlers.
c.
Nearby settlers were being raided constantly.
d.
Gold was discovered and the U.S. wanted it.


Please select the best answer from the choices provided
History
2 answers:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: [D] Gold was discovered and the U.S. wanted it.

Explanation: Yes, we all know people don't need an explanation for this type of question.

Andrews [41]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answer is D. The U.S. wanted to keep Native Americans farther away from settlers.

Explanation:

This answer is correct, trust me

You might be interested in
HELP!!
KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

They occupied higher ground

Explanation:

Again, I haven't taken the class, but I love american history, so here you go XD

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these would be seen as the LEAST likely threat to Africa’s water supply? A)Erosion B)Deforestation C)Nuclear Waste D)In
serious [3.7K]

Answer:C

Explanation:I am leaning towards C the most.

8 0
3 years ago
What British practice was a violation of neutral rights?
g100num [7]
Impressment was a violation of neutral rights
7 0
3 years ago
In 1964, Kitty Genovese was brutally stabbed to death in front of her apartment building. Police reports showed that although mo
Brut [27]

Answer:

the bystander effect

Explanation:

The bystander effect is the social psychological phenomenon that occurs when individuals are less likely to intervene to help someone in an emergency. The greater the number of observer present at the site of a situation, the less likely would be a probability of helping hand. In contrast to this people would react more likely when there no or few witnessed present. There are many reasons recorded-for this effect like ambiguity, diffusion of responsibility, cultural difference, etc.

6 0
3 years ago
What are the approximate beginning and ending dates of the medieval period?
TiliK225 [7]
It's approximately 450-1450 AD
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What economic and political forces fed westward expansion during the 1840s?
    9·1 answer
  • How long did john f kennedy serve as president?
    10·1 answer
  • Shakespeare’s historical plays dramatize the lives of English rulers during the Medieval era. Why are these plays not always his
    7·2 answers
  • Farmers knew little beyond agriculture. true or false
    11·1 answer
  • Question 23 unsaved the idea of ________ was at the heart of george w. bush's 2005 plan for social security reform.
    6·1 answer
  • Throughout the 1800s and early 1900s Britain had successfully transformed itself from a constitution monarchy to a parliamentary
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What kind of<br> democracy do we<br> have in the United<br> States?
    5·1 answer
  • What is indulgence?
    12·1 answer
  • In 1950
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following is a characteristic of a "limited government?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!