1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VladimirAG [237]
3 years ago
5

In the early 1800s, why was there so little settlement on the Great Plains?

History
1 answer:
pochemuha3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

C. Conditions there were not suitable for the kind of farming done at that time.

Explanation:

i just took the test and got a 100

You might be interested in
Desperate, Will Mark Brainllest and Give Thanks for Correct Answer
lora16 [44]

Answer:

It changed lives

Explanation:

It changed because automobiles gave people access to drive to jobs, places houses, and services.

3 0
2 years ago
Muhammad Ali tried to westernize Egypt by
agasfer [191]
<span>building a large army and expanding Egyptian territory</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“Caught in the street by the truant Officer, or by the agents of the Children’s Societies, peddling, perhaps, or begging, to hel
Blababa [14]

Answer:

The living situation in slums was bad and an unhealthy environment especially for children.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Living in a bad situation indicates that the people need some resources and supplies for their families. Boys should handle this tough situation in serving their families.

So they loitering in the streets resulted in being captured by police and they will be sent to the reformatory. This reformatory suited for the people having a negative mind and it doesn't improve the lives of young people.

4 0
3 years ago
After the death of Shah Abbas, women were forced to give up their freedom for a life of .......... and had to wear a ...........
bixtya [17]

Answer:

life in to seclusion and wear the veil

3 0
3 years ago
What resulted from the demobilization of troops after world war i?
Fantom [35]
In the United States, there was a domino effect boom - we were primarily agrarian and when the military was demobilized there was a baby boom and many of the returning troops moved to cities and created an economic boom- they had just seen the great big world - they weren't going back to the farm and the small lives they lived before.  Europe was in need of a great many manufactured goods and we supplied a good portion of it and the US celebrated with new music, dance, fashion, ideals, and art - culturally America blossomed - a post war renaissance of sorts and to the victor goes the spoils attitude as artists, designers, musicians, composers, playwrights 

In Europe, including Russia, there was chaos.  The great Empires and Royal Lines of Rulers were gone: Russian, Austrio-Hungarian, German, Tsars, Emperors, Kaisers - ALL GONE.  The Versailles treaty beggared and humiliated Germany.  In Europe, manufacturing and agriculture were in a shambles and governments and industry were trying to figure out what to do and how to do it and did they have any authority anymore.  Unemployment skyrocketed and discontent swelled and defeated countries licked their wounds and hardened their outlooks preparing for a future rematch.  Russia became 4 socialist republics and morphed into the Soviet Union and with a reign of Terror the modern world had never seen before the USSR began it's methodical deliberate soul crushing brutalities on the people of the new Soviet Union - 4 soviets to start eventually expanding into 15 soviets, 16 if you count the Vory y zakone.  The USSR had big construction plans even though they were overwhelmingly agrarian but the communists had stolen/liberated/accessed (pick whichever term speaks to you) unimaginable stores of vast wealth in natural resources - platinum and diamond mines not to mention timber cotton wheat coal oil and on an on.  So, the Russian empire gone and the white army a fastly fading memory, the Red Army took control of all the military and because they had a new country to run, they didn't really demobilize in the way that the United States did - WWI was the war to end all wars and there was no reason to keep or train an army for future wars because there would never again be one.  Simple.  Wrong of course - less than 20 years later we would know that only the dead have seen an end to war - think it was George Santayana who wrote it in his Tipperary soliloquy but everybody else wants to say Plato - either way we learned the lesson - our American military demobilization was the last time the American people would ever be so naive regarding war.  Maniacal madmen are a fact of life and we will stand an Army of Orwellian Rough Men at all times (the allusion I am making is to the quote by essayist Richard Grenier who wrote in 1993:  "As George Orwell pointed out, people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.")
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Greatest challenges facing the American economy in the years following World War I?
    9·2 answers
  • In ancient times, India people were divide into castes.How did being in a low caste affect people lives
    9·1 answer
  • Should resources be protected or extracted and used by society? Explain your answer
    14·2 answers
  • Who is the vice president of usa
    14·1 answer
  • When did Songhai empire reign?
    11·1 answer
  • In general, international correspondence tends to be ________ than that of the united states.
    12·1 answer
  • Religious freedom was a goal in the colonial settlement of both:
    14·2 answers
  • What was one of the causes of the War of 1812?
    15·1 answer
  • Hernando de soto and his soldiers often treated Native Americans harshly during the spanish quest for​
    11·2 answers
  • Which is not one of the middle colonies?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!