1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
4 years ago
12

Across cultures, individuals with schizophrenia in developing, nonindustrialized nations tend to have worse outcomes than those

in developed, industrialized nations.
a. True
b. False
Social Studies
1 answer:
kiruha [24]4 years ago
4 0
The answer to this statement is true. It is because this has become a sociocultural factor in which is the one of those responsible for causing schizophrenia and by this, people are likely to develop this because of this certain factor, especially in developing countries.
You might be interested in
Constitution is the main law of land​
uysha [10]

Answer:

A constitution has been regarded to be the main law of land. The reason is that it is the God father of all laws in India. To be precise, it contains all laws mentioned in a clear cut manner. As it is the creator of all laws, it has been regarded to be the main law of land

In general a constitution is the charter of a government that sets form of government, the general organization of the government, the basic national law of the land, the legal authorities of the various departments, the limits on the government, and the rights of the citizens. It is the legal framework to which all lower laws must comply. So it is the base, overriding law, or as you say, the main law.

The US Constitution does this as well, and since the country was formed from a group of independent states, it specifically names the power given by the states to the federal government and says that any thing that is not specifically given to the federal government rightly remains with the states. That is why in the US some states have very different laws from other states. As long as state laws do not violate federal law they have a right to do things the way they see fit. But, for instance, since the Constitution has banned slavery, no state can declare it illegal. Any federal law that does not conflict with the Constitution supersedes any law of a state. By the same token any federal law that conflicts with a Constitutionally protected state law, would cause the Supreme Court to invalidate the federal law. The Constitution is the supreme law of the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP PLEASE¡! How does the separation of powers guard against tyranny?
anyanavicka [17]

<u>Analysis: The power of the federal government is divided between the three branches: legislative, executive and judicial, which constitutes the "Separation of powers" in the strict sense. To avoid tyranny or despotism, the exercise of power by any of the three powers of the federal government is limited in several ways by the powers given to the other two, thus establishing the principle of limits and counterweights.</u>  For example, the legislative branch of the Congress of The United States is limited and counterbalanced by the presidential veto; and the power of the president to appoint ambassadors, federal judges, and high federal officials are limited by the constitutional requirement that those appointments obtain the consent of the Senate.

This method of separation of powers has also been carried out, within each State, in its own state constitution through the division of state governmental power among the three branches of government of the State; the creation of checks and balances between the three branches of government State, and the delegation of governmental power to two lower levels of local government, counties, and municipalities.

7 0
3 years ago
How has the media impacted public opinion of wars?
PolarNik [594]
The media has the ability to influence public opinion of wars by putting out propaganda in support of one country and against another. This garners public support for one country and their actions while condemning the other. The information is often one sided and not relayed in a subjective manner, creating an unfair bias in the public eye.
5 0
3 years ago
Citizens were made up of patricians and _______.
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

plebeians

Explanation:

Citizens were made up of patricians and plebeians.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between immigration and emigration
vazorg [7]
The difference between “immigrate” and “emigrate” is that “immigrating” is the act of entering a foreign country to live while “emigrating” is the act of leaving a country to live in another.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what stage of quasi-courtship behavior are we engaging when we manipulate our appearance by combing our hair, straightening o
    10·1 answer
  • It is evident that janet, sangita, and jake are each interested in doing good work. they've discussed achieving good results, an
    13·1 answer
  • Which criminal justice profession requires the most training and experience?
    13·2 answers
  • While walking through the toy store with her 1-year-old son, Brianna stops and points out the baseballs, shows her son guns and
    11·2 answers
  • The year is 1916. You are a general in the Tsar’s army on the eastern front. You are writing a report for the government in Mosc
    12·1 answer
  • Why is a representative government necessary?
    14·1 answer
  • The Dawes Act of 1887 did which of the following to Native American reservations?
    13·1 answer
  • How to advertise an app to get more reach?​
    6·1 answer
  • In which South Asian country do citizens have the fewest voting rights
    6·2 answers
  • True or false, Opportunity cost means how much you have to spend to do something.​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!