It's definitely D.
It's for sure not C. And I've never read the full story, but this passage doesn't indicate a depressing mood of foreshadowing danger. And the vocabulary in the writing doesn't impact the story itself.
The assignment wants to know a personal experience you had at a grocery store in your neighborhood. As I don't have access to it, I can't write your paragraph, but I'll show you all the necessary structure for it.
<h3>Paragraph structure</h3>
- Introduction: Introduce what the grocery store is and what products can be found there.
- Body: Describe the elements of the grocery store that you like and explain why they are good in your opinion. Then describe what you don't like and explain why.
- Conclusion: Determine if the grocery store is pleasant or not and if it fulfills its mission.
This paragraph should be a descriptive text, because you will show the characteristics of the grocery store, describing it and showing details.
Below is an example of how you might write the paragraph:
<em>Lourdes grocery store is a block away from my house and there we can find different types of products. This diversity is what makes the grocery store special and I really like how we can find food, drinks, toys, objects, magazines, and many other products. Also, the grocery store is a bit of a mess, probably because of its diverse collection. It makes me a little confused and I don't like it. However, the grocery store is a treasure for our neighborhood and it's great how we can count on it for all hours and for any need.</em>
Learn more about what a descriptive text is:
brainly.com/question/3530147
#SPJ1
Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
The weather makes the ship too unruly
