All of them are Principles of Government.
<em>Individual rights</em> are unalienable rights that are guaranteed to all citizens.
<em>Popular sovereignty</em> means that the authority of the government comes from the people that elect their representatives.
<em>Separation of Powers</em> is a separation of responsibility and limitations that are given to each branch. The system of <em>check and balances</em> is also a part of this, giving each branch a way to limit other branch and control it.
<em>Federalism</em> is a system of government that divides the power into national and state governments.
Answer:
You could get hacked or worse.
Explanation:
Zero times that the word slavery appears in the constitution.
Answer:
Why shouldn't we judge historical figures by the standards of our time?
Many of the vices we might rightfully judge a historical society or individual for are largely universal across culture and society.
We should judge them accordingly and learn from their mistakes, but we should also judge them by the degree to which that person or culture rejected those common vices and built something better. This is something quite rare and it’s far more useful as a learning tool for us to focus on this.
For example, the Greeks and Romans practiced slaveryBut so did every other ancient society. What is unique and admirable about the Greeks and Romans is the degree to which they did respect indvidual rights, seriously questioned slavery as an institution, and developed a secular, pro reason culture
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
