3. It was thought to be an accident
4. Shansville, Pennsylvania
5. All of above
Answer:
vibrant, eradication
Explanation:
The vibrant blooms attract butterflies which spread pollen, therefore making eradication (complete destruction of something) of the weed difficult.
The correct answer to this question is letter D. Around sunrise.
Around sunrise due to the time. I would say it's around sunrise, just because the sun is usually out in the sky already by 7:30, and yet it is hanging just above the horizon in the story.
These are the following options:
<span>A. Around midnight
B. Around sunset
C. Around noon
D. Around sunrise</span>
Answer: See below
Explanation:
Human cloning should be allowed provided specific criteria and rules are satisfied. Human cloning is still dangerous, to say the least. Many people have long bragged about the prospect of cloning humans as a scientific advance, a gateway to immortality, free organs, and other benefits. However, 21 years after the first genetically cloned sheep, Dolly, there is still a great deal of ambiguity about the safety and ethical qualities of genetically cloning people. Scientists have cautioned that genetically cloned individuals are much more likely to have catastrophic genetic abnormalities and life-threatening health issues. Cloning has the potential to disrupt the development of a newborn human. One of the first genetically cloned calves, for example, died after just two months due to blood and heart issues.
This sort of cloning also presents serious ethical concerns. For instance, how is this different from murdering a child? Abortion is the only other case that resembles therapeutic cloning - the procedure of creating embryonic stem cells from the host's DNA - and the destruction of a human embryo. The only component of therapeutic cloning that would be immoral would be murdering a five-day-old person. Abortion regulations in some countries such as Canada already indicate that women may get abortions at any point throughout their pregnancy. So, how can one advocate for abortion while opposing therapeutic cloning? While abortions are performed to aid or even save a woman's life, one may argue that therapeutic cloning provides no such advantages. On the contrary, therapeutic cloning will provide access to life-saving medications to millions, if not billions, of people. Therapeutic cloning has the potential to potentially cure cancer, if only society could see how much the advantages outweigh the risks. To summarize, human cloning should be authorized if the cloning is therapeutic and the embryo is less than five days old, and future human cloning should be restricted until scientists have considerably decreased the hazards. Our laws already make it legal to abort a 21-week-old embryo if the mother chooses, much alone a five-day-old embryo.
<em></em>
