Military power, strength, and national security are the goals of a prince.
Machiavelli’s philosophy is basically to become a good leader you must do anything even it is immoral and wrong. He first writes that a prince’s duty concerning military matter must always think of war only, even in times of peace. They must know their surroundings exactly so they can defend and make effective strategies to counter the enemy’s attack. They must also know historical battles so they will be able to learn their tactics and improve on it. He then talks about the prince’s path: should the prince be generous or a miser. He is saying that it is better to be known as a greedy prince than a generous prince because if the prince follows the good path it will only lead him to destruction while being greedy will result in his safety.
I believe the answer is B. Two-thirds of the states vote to hold a constitutional convention.
Plastic is the least likely material to be recycled in the United States.
Specifically PET plastic, referring to polyethylene terephthalate.
The gravity model tells about the flow and volume of people and goods used to determine the optimal location. Based on the model, site E is the best for the new coffee shop. Thus, option e is correct.
<h3>What is a gravity model?</h3>
A gravity model represents a geographical distribution of the people, community, services, and the flow of commodities and goods in a defined region.
The model shows the flow and movement of the services, products, and people from one region to another. The movement helps in the understanding of the optimal location for the service.
In the given model, site E is the best optimal location as it is surrounded by more streets than any other site and has a large volume and people flow.
Therefore, site E is the best optimal location to open a new coffee shop.
Learn more about the gravity model here:
brainly.com/question/15454624
#SPJ1
Answer:
- distance herself from a perspective that could be supported by the evidence she cites.
Explanation:
Towards the conclusion of the end paragraph, the author asserts that the examples provided by him did not mean to specify that he favors or willing to open such professional opportunities for women too because he aims to detach himself from any of the ideas that could be backed by the evidence she proffers. <u>The author clarifies that these instances do not reflects his point of view either or to substantiate the claim of opening these professions to females but only to provide an aspect of the topic</u>.
