Answer:
False
Explanation:
Let’s say this.
A group of teenage boys walks into a retail store, and an officer is 25ft from their presence. They run out of the store carrying electronics. The worker from the store shouts for someone to help them. The officer runs after the juveniles and he/she has the right to make a warrantless arrest on behalf of theft of property, which can result in a fine or time in jail.
So your answer wouldv’e been false.
With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
Answer:
16 lololololoololololololololoLOLOLOLOLOOOLLOLOLLOOLOOLLLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLOOOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLLOOLLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOOL
Explanation:
Answer:
true
Explanation: bankruptcy are special courts in the US district court system
