The Supreme Court interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment very narrowly, stating that the federal government could not prosecute individuals for discriminatory acts. Lynching's and mob violence were left to the states to handle. Within a generation after the end of Reconstruction 1877
Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a supreme court case known for establishing the principle of Judicial review in US. Judicial review means that US courts can strike down statutes, laws and other government actions that violate the US constituion. This case is considered to be the one that laid the foundation of US constitutional law. The court's opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
As per the provision of separation of power the constitution framers wanted the government to have enough powers so that they could run the country but wouldn't be able to abuse it. Thus they developed the provision of separation of power, according to which the power is distributed among the three branches of the the government. So that if one branch of the government tries to abuse their powers others could balance it.
Marbury vs. Madison strengthened this provision as by judicial review the court can control the Congress by declaring laws unconstitutional and illegal.
Bartolomeu Dias was the first European to round the southern tip of Africa. He named it Cape of Storms, but King John later renamed it Cape of Good Hope.
Actually Tet was more of a political victory for the
North. They launched a surprise attack
on South Vietnam during the Tet holiday on January 30, 1968. They attacked not only military targets but
towns and cities. Communist forces
managed to storm the U.S. Embassy.
Though a counterattack enabled the U.S. regain the territories assaulted
by the North, the reaction at home was so negative that support for American
involvement in the States dropped. This
led to the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Vietnam and eventually the North
conquered the South.
