D. Many new businesses and jobs were created
The statement regarding "The Missouri Compromise, 1820."which is true is A<u> ----No new territories would be allowed to have </u><u>slavery.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?</h3>
The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to maintain a balance between the number of slave states and the number of free states in the Union. It permits Missouri to enter as a slave state at the same Maine would be as a free state, thus maintaining a balance in numbers of free and slave states<u>.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the Missouri Compromise ?</h3>
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, was a law that tried the attention of growing sectional tensions over the issue of slavery. By passing this law, President James Monroe signed, the U.S. Congress admitted Missouri to the Union as a state that allowed slavery, and Maine regarded as a free state.
Learn more about Missouri Compromise:
brainly.com/question/14383383
#SPJ1
The answer to your question is,
C. the British gains land but lost a lot of money leading them to tax the colonies
-Mabel <3
An increased presence of Christians in the Levant during the Middle Ages.
the development of military orders.
a polarisation of the East and West based on religious differences.
the specific application of religious goals to warfare in the Levant, Iberian peninsula, and Baltic region, in particular.
the increased role and prestige of the popes and the Catholic Church in secular affairs.
the souring of relations between the West and the Byzantine Empire leading, ultimately, to the latter’s destruction.
an increase in the power of the royal houses of Europe.
a stronger collective cultural identity in Europe.
an increase in xenophobia and intolerance between Christians and Muslims, and between Christians and Jews, heretics and pagans.
an increase in international trade and exchange of ideas and technology.
an increase in the power of such Italian states as Venice, Genoa, and Pisa.
the appropriation of many Christian relics to Europe.
the use of a religious historical precedent to justify colonialism, warfare and terrorism.