Answer:
A white, landowning male farmer would have been considered a citizen.
<h3>Answer:</h3>
A) a fear of European involvement in Latin America.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The Monroe Doctrine was a United States strategy of confronting European colonialism in the U.S starting in 1823. It declared that additional efforts by European states to take charge of an independent nation in North or South U.S would be observed as "the demonstration of a contrary disposition proceeding the United States." At the same event, the doctrine perceived that the U.S. would realize and not interpose with surviving European colonies nor interrupt in the internal affairs of European lands.
<span>684 mi² This is how long the okefenokee swamp is.</span>
I’m not 100% sure but The Hispanics had more supplies the natives where still fighting with bows and arrows and other things that they made. The Spanish had guns and swords. So it wasent a equal balance between the two sides.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The most valid counter-argument to the description of the Mongols by the Russian duke was that the Mongols were interested only in plunder and treasure but not in controlling the Russian territory.
As we know by reading this part of history, the Mongols were terrible warriors that showed no mercy. They were fierce fighters that indeed were interested in destroying and plunder. And more than conquering and establish a form of government to rule a territory, by the way, they attacked and proceeded, it seemed that they were more interested in becoming wealthy.
