1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Xelga [282]
3 years ago
5

In the period 1450 - 1750, imperial expansion relied on the increased use of gunpowder, cannons, and armed trade to establish la

rge empires in both hemispheres. Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which empire building among one or more European maritime powers was diff erent from empire building by Eurasian land empires
History
1 answer:
MariettaO [177]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

We can compare the Mongol Empire with the British Empire in three ways:

The Mongol Empire did not colonize as much land as the British Empire.

Several reasons account for this, first, it's a demographic problem: the Mongols were less than the British, so they did not have enough people to populate conquered areas.

Secondly, the lands the Mongold conquered were already inhabited by other ethnic groups and there was not a lot of room.

The British Empire founded colonies in areas that had sparse population: Australia, Canada, the United States, and thousands of colonists emigrated and found room to establish farms.

The Mongol empire was interconnected by land, the British Empire was interconnected by water:

The entirety of the Mongol Empire was located in Eurasia, and spanned across deserts, praires, plains, mountain ranges, and river banks. The British Empire included territories all over the globe, in the five continents, and was held together thanks to the might of the British Navy, by far the most powerful navy at the time.

The British gained more wealth from the Empire than the Mongols:

The height of the British Empire coincided with industrialization. In a positive feedback loop, the British extracted raw materials from their colonies, and transformed them into finished goods and services. This brought enormous wealth to Great Britain.

The Mongol Empire on the other hand, did extract wealth from their colonies, but as they were not industrial yet, they did not so to the same extent.

You might be interested in
Which effect BEST completes the diagram?
Tanya [424]
I researched this topic, and according to wikipedia: "<span>raise the stock of Christianity within the empire and it reaffirmed the importance of religious worship to the welfare of the state..." 

From this piece of information, I think that (A) is the correct answer since it seems like the religion seemed to spread throughout the empire quickly. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement is true about the relationship between a monopoly and its competition in a market?
erica [24]
A monopoly would have almost complete control over a market, and would have virtually no competition 

hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast The Mongol Empire and The Arab Empire?
photoshop1234 [79]
<span>Both the Arab and Mongol Empires has periods of intellectual expansion. but  the Arab Empire was created due to the rise of Islam and the Mongol empire was created due to the Mongols tearing  away from Mongolia.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the United States' changing role in the world during the twentieth century? a:It changed from a g
Luda [366]
The statement that best describes the United States' changing role in the world during the twentieth century was E.<span>It became a military superpower in the world but lacked a strong economy. The reason for the non strong economy was due to the Great Depression, and financial crisis of the 1920's.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Explain how the U.S. supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona has impacted society?
andriy [413]
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>

<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>

<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Nothing is good or bad, but it is<br>our thinking which makes it so.​
    11·1 answer
  • Which compromises solved the biggest challenges to ratifying the Constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • How was slavery used throughout the South.
    13·2 answers
  • Which describes working conditions during the late 1800s?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did President Kennedy create the Peace Corps?
    12·2 answers
  • What are the pros and the cons of abolishing the electoral college
    14·1 answer
  • Where was the kingdom of axum
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an agent of political socialization?
    5·1 answer
  • What happened in the Vietnam War
    7·1 answer
  • In 1800 what region was west of the United States
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!