1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa [10]
3 years ago
6

How did the Anglo American settlement of Texas in the 1820s contrast from the Spanish settlement of Texas a century earlier?

History
2 answers:
Leni [432]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is B) Anglo settlers sought cheap land to farm, whereas Spanish settlers built missions to convert Native Americans.

The Anglo American settlement of Texas in the 1820s contrasted from the Spanish settlement of Texas a century earlier in that "Anglo settlers sought cheap land to farm, whereas Spanish settlers built missions to convert Native Americans.

Spaniards, in this case, Spanish religious congregations had established some missions in the region of Texas as part of New Spain. They wanted to evangelize the Native American Indians. But since American people such as Moses Austin asked Spanish authorities.  to get some portion of land in Texas to be sold to other pioneeres, Texas started to be settled in by people that wanted settle in the Region.

SVEN [57.7K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

most likely it is A)

Anglo settlers wanted to live peaceably among Native Americans, whereas Spanish settlers sought to drive them away.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Before advent of money, people used to follow which system of exchange?​
erastova [34]

Giving one thing for the exchange of another.

For example:

Giving rice for getting honey.

Giving clothes for getting shoes.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The north planned to blockade southern ports as part of the war strategy true or false
Goryan [66]
Its true alright son
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Slave Traders showed tremendous cruelty to their captives. Why would slave traders be hesitant to kill slaves?
Ganezh [65]

Answer:

Slaves were property

Explanation:

Slaves were essentially property, worth money and were used for extremely cheap labor. Killing the slave would essentially be purposely crashing your car. That is why slavers practiced cruel punishments such as beatings to discipline disobedient slaves.

3 0
3 years ago
All of these problems created by the late 19th century urbanization EXCEPT
Anastasy [175]
I'm pretty sure its d because there is always need for a adequate water supply
7 0
3 years ago
How was China lost to Communist leaders? (post WWII)
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

Russia came in and really helped China rebuild. They established a communist state, even though the majority of the public didn’t want that to happen. The people eventually fled to Taiwan.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the Pentagon Papers?
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I GIVE (20 POINTS)
    6·2 answers
  • Slate is a fine grained rock composed of tightly packed layers. Most slate was originally some type of shale. What process forme
    8·2 answers
  • To what extent did the romans borrow from etruscan society in shaping their own?
    14·1 answer
  • Which accurately demonstrates the progression of technology
    10·1 answer
  • What was the impact of japan’s geography in its economic and political development ?
    7·1 answer
  • 2. What was required for GA to rejoin the Union?
    14·1 answer
  • Why is Gandhi considered one of the most influential people of the 20th century ?
    8·2 answers
  • Might a teenager growing up in Kenya in the 1950s have had a different view? Explain
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of checks and balances outlined in the US Constitution?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!