Answer:
b.
Explanation:
Defenders of the British position invoked the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which conclusively demonstrated that acts of Parliament, adopted w/ royal assent, were the sovereign source of law within the British Empire. This caused a permanent establishment of Parliament as the ruling power in England, thus switching from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy.
Your answer is option 3 or letter C
Hope this helps you
Have a great day
I believe the answer is: <span>this office is elected independently of the governor and can develop a dominant legislative role
On paper, a lieutenant governor is technically placed below the governor of the state but would stand in line for the position in case the governor unable to fulfill hi/her duty. So, technically, lieutenant governors had a massive legislative and executive power within a state even without having to appeal to the citizens.</span><span />
The main reasons the bicameral Congress of the United States (consisting of two chambers: Senate and House of Representatives) was created are the following:
The separation of powers was aimed to prevent tyranny. A unicameral legislature would mean to put too much power in one institution. However, with these two legislation, each can be checked by the other, and laws must be approved by both before they can be presented for executive approval.
Though American had gained independence of Britain, they got their inspiration from many of their laws in matters related to their government, including the inclusion of two houses. The British Parliament had two houses: the House of Lords (Composed of representatives of the aristocracy) and the House of Commons (Led with representatives of the people)
- To ensure fair representation of every American state
With a bicameral Congress, representation had a balance between statehood and population. Representation in the House was based on a state's population, and representation in the Senate is equal for every state. This accomplishment wouldn't have been possible with a unicameral Congress and would have been unfair to large and small states.
the answer is (drum roll) true
