Answer: True
Explanation:
Dollar diplomacy was a form of US foreign policy developed by President William Howard Taft, which consisted of using the economic power of the United States over Latin America and East Asia (with loans), rather than using military force.
It should be noted that it was President Roosevelt (Taft's predecessor) who laid the foundation for this policy. All this in order to protect the interests of the United States in Latin America, by encouraging stability in those countries and expanding US commercial interests in those nations.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The main differences between the editorialist from the Chicago Times and President Lincoln on the purpose of the Civil War were the following.
The United States President Abraham Lincoln referred to the purpose of the Civil War in his famous Gettysburg speech, delivered on November 19, 1863.
He was in a ceremony in the National Cemetery located in Pennsylvania when he paid tribute to the American soldiers that had died in the war. And exhorted the people to follow the principles of liberty and justice that characterized the United States.
On the other hand, the editorial published in the Chicago Times criticized Lincoln and his message. The editorial published was: <em>"The cheeks of American people must tingle with shame as he reads the silly, flat, and dishwatery utterances."</em>
The editorialists expressed that Lincoln's message was not a good one and out of context.
Sahara.<span>Namib.</span><span>The Kalahari Desert.</span><span>Thar Desert.</span><span>Gobi Desert.</span>
Answer: freedom of speech was the on of the first amendments stating that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Explanation:
It is the belief that freedom of expression does not mean freedom to speak your mind without government interference, but freedom to speak your mind without any interference at all.
The answer is True so click true
