1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
3 years ago
6

Which best explains how the president selects a justice for the Supreme Court?

History
2 answers:
trapecia [35]3 years ago
6 0
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice. The president selects a justice for the Supreme Court to whom he considers the most qualified and will most likely support his agenda. I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.
Llana [10]3 years ago
4 0

The option that best explains how the president selects a Justice for the Supreme Court is <em>The president selects a judge whom he considers the most qualified and will most likely support his agenda</em>. According to the Constitution Supreme Court Justices and other judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate. Potential nominees are recommended by the senators or other members of the same political party as the President so they will most likely support his agenda.


You might be interested in
(please help asap 15 points)
Helga [31]

Answer:

I think its A

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a true statement about the Opium Wars?
pochemuha
I think it would be C. Not sure thought get a second opinion
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
15th admedment ratified
Tanya [424]

Answer:Passed by Congress February 26, 1869, and ratified February 3, 1870, the 15th amendment granted African American men the right to vote. ... For more than 50 years, the overwhelming majority of African American citizens were reduced to second-class citizenship under the “Jim Crow” segregation system.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Believed that the human mind could understand everything
Musya8 [376]

Answer:

Explanation:

If human kind could understand everything I very much doubt there would of been any wars that broke out and our entire history would change... The people we are today is not who we would of been if we understood everything.

5 0
3 years ago
Essential question: Should the Constitution have been ratified in 1787 without the Bill of Rights?
galina1969 [7]

Answer: No the Constitution should have not been ratified in 1787 without the Bill of Rights. Because it was a huge part of history yk.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whoever gets it right I will give you brainlyest!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • When were transgenders allowed in the military?
    15·1 answer
  • What did the Wampanoag Indians want in exchange for their help?
    10·1 answer
  • Which Oklahoman was the first female in modern history to lead the Cherokee Nation?
    13·2 answers
  • Why might Malcolm X say that Black or African American people have only experienced the "American
    13·1 answer
  • During the great depression what was 3 bad things that happend
    15·1 answer
  • What was the end result Reagan's tax cuts mixed with increased spending?
    10·2 answers
  • Article 4, Section 9 tells of the accountability the Governor has to the people. True False
    12·1 answer
  • What was the Cold War and what did it do
    5·1 answer
  • When was rocket technology develop
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!