1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grandymaker [24]
3 years ago
12

What type of impearlism was most brutal?

History
2 answers:
melisa1 [442]3 years ago
8 0
<span>The direct rule is known to be the most brutal type of imperialism – where a certain country is being ruled by foreign officials – therefore making it a colony. There is no self-rule for natives in here, and this is all for the sake of turning a large colony into a powerful empire. One notable brutality of direct rule in all of history happened when Belgian King Leopold II ruled the Belgian Congo. There were 10,000,000 locals that were killed during his tenure as a ruler. Other countries that practiced this method were France, Morocco and Vietnam.</span>
umka21 [38]3 years ago
8 0

The direct rule is known to be the most brutal type of imperialism

You might be interested in
PLEASEEEE ANSWERRRRR
Julli [10]

Answer:

im going with an immagrant from europe right bc the others sound like they can all vote srry if im wrong

4 0
3 years ago
In the carton above , what do the men at the top of the image represent? What are they sitting on?
sasho [114]

Answer:a chair

Explanation:

i have eyes ... DEKU lol

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HURRY
kotegsom [21]
If u want it fast here you go

the answer is"<span>a. manufacturing processes"</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did farming change<br> the lives of Neolithic people?
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

While hunter-gatherers ate wild grains that they collected, early farmers saved some of the grains to plant. Humans lived differently once they learned how to grow crops and tame animals that produced food. They now could produce a constant food supply. This allowed the population to grow at a faster rate.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One major difference between McPherson's and Horwitz's historical interpretation of the Civil War.
TiliK225 [7]
The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a result of nationalism in Europe during the 1700s and 1800s?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the columbus exchange and what items were exchanged
    13·1 answer
  • In what kind of government does a small group have a firm control over a country?
    15·1 answer
  • How were townships divided the ordinance of 1785
    7·1 answer
  • Why was it so important in the Han
    11·2 answers
  • Why were the colonies so angry about the stamp act, even though it was such a small amount
    11·1 answer
  • Who was general Pershing
    7·2 answers
  • How does the presdient limit the judicial powers of the courts?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement about the 14th Amendment is accurate?
    10·2 answers
  • 2 major weakness in the Articles of Confederation were
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!