<span>The answer to your question is they were village-based cultures built around clans, they were also very poor</span>
The answer I would have chosen would have been that Paris was in chaos. Someone had to do something. The second and 4th answers are nonsense. He was a skillful politician. He took advantage of circumstances. I think however you are intended to pick A.
First One (A) <<<<==== answer.
What Marie should primarily consider if she decides to purchase a car of not using rational decision making is the marginal benefits and costs of her decision. So if she is thinking of buying of car, she should consider how much she would spend and what would be the benefits she can get in having a car.
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
