Answer:
Facial expressions and speech balloons
The best rebuttal to this anti-burn viewpoint is this:
- Without the controlled fire, more fuel may have built up, leading to greater damage.
<h3 /><h3>What is a rebuttal?</h3>
A rebuttal is a rejection of a previously stated claim. In the passage above, the claim is that the controlled fire caused significant losses to the people and environment.
But if there is a rebuttal that claims that the controlled fire was helpful because it greatly limited the reach of the burn, then we can consider that as a valid rebuttal.
A rebuttal is meant to find a fault in the claim and gives a reason why the opposite of the claim is accurate.
Learn more about rebuttals here:
brainly.com/question/24690335
#SPJ1
Answer:
The difference between a Supreme Court opinion and a Supreme Court dissent is:
B. An opinion is a Supreme Court decision that the majority of the judges agree with, while a dissent disagrees with the decision.
Explanation:
As we know, the Supreme Court is composed of nine justices. The decision most of the justices agree with is called an opinion. If one or more justices disagree with the opinion of the majority, we have a dissenting opinion or dissent. It is important to understand that they do not have to disagree with the opinion entirely, that is, they can disagree with only certain parts of the opinion.
Based on the information given, the inference that can be deduced is B. The windmills have the potential to provide an escape from poverty.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means a conclusion that can be reached based on the evidence that have been provided.
In the story, the inference that can be deduced is that the windmills have the potential to provide an escape from poverty.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
Where is the poet? Post the poet then I can answer it.
