1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Soloha48 [4]
3 years ago
11

5 reasons to end child labor in the 1800s

History
1 answer:
GalinKa [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: 1. Bad working conditions (crowded and unclean factories)

2. A lack of safety codes or legislation (no proper fire escapes crowded work space)

3. Long hours were normal (long hours of 12+ hours no days off)

4. Children were payed less ( business owners payed children less)

5. Their small stature enabled them to complete tasks in factories or mines that would be challenging for adults.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Hammurabi is best remembered for his
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:    Hammurabi's Code

Explanation:  Hammurabi was the Babylonian king, a member of the Babylonian Dynasty that ruled Mesopotamia. Hammurabi himself ruled from 1792 to 1750 BC,  and fought against other kingdoms and dynasties in Mesopotamia created the great Babylonian Empire. He is best known for his law written about 1754 BC, and contains 282 rules, laws, and this is considered one of the oldest written laws in the world. This law precisely defines social classes, rights and obligations.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do Marx and Engels argue about free trade?
morpeh [17]

Answer:

He argued that by unleashing competition, free trade was likely to drive down workers' wages

Explanation:

Marx also disputed the argument that free trade facilitated a natural division of labour between countries. The free traders failed to understand that "one country can grow rich at the expense of another

4 0
3 years ago
Zimbabwe achieved majority rule
enot [183]
1.A)through elections/ 2.C)South Africa/ 3.C)economic sanctions(POSSIBLY)
4 0
3 years ago
Write an essay describing the quote in relation to the opinion of Rizal to the Katipunan’s Plan "To die and conquer is pleasant;
leva [86]

Answer:

To die and conquer is pleasant; but to die and be conquered is painful."​

Explanation:

To die and conquer is pleasant but to die and be conquered is painful because living like a slave under invaders is very painful and shameful for the people who have self respect. Conquering a place is a very pleasant feeling but someone be conquered is a painful feeling. Those people having no self respect can live as a slave in order to save their life but those people who have self respect can't live as a slave. They prefer death instead of living as a slave so they revolt and fought for the freedom of theirselve and their country. So that's why the opinion of Rizal is correct. The kings in ancient times considered shameful to be conquered so that's why they fight till their death but can't accept the slavery of the conqueror.

3 0
3 years ago
a historian who compares the expansion od political systems to the expansion of economic system is organizing history by?
Flura [38]
The answer you are looking for is: THEME
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1.) from the ninth century onward, the swahili we’re best known for their:
    12·1 answer
  • What is the dominant religion of India?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an advantage helped by the south during the civil war
    10·2 answers
  • Need help asap
    13·2 answers
  • There is an opportunity cost for all economic choices because:
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·1 answer
  • What was the diaspora caused by
    14·1 answer
  • How did labor unions influence farmers?
    15·2 answers
  • In the late 1970s, the United States was experiencing levels of inflation usually found in 3rd world nations. How was this infla
    11·1 answer
  • What is communism in Russian ​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!