Answer:
Sales quantity for A = $17,977
Sales quantity for B = $18,539
Sales quantity for C = $18,876
Explanation:
Given that
Monthly profit = $11,000
Fixed cost A = $5,000
Fixed cost B = $5,500
Fixed cost c = $5,800
The computation of given question is below:-
Every Sandwich Profit
= $2.65 - $1.76
= $0.89
Sales quantity = (Profit + Fixed cost) ÷ Profit per unit
Sales quantity for A = ($11,000 + $5,000) ÷ $0.89
= $17,977
Sales quantity for B = ($11,000 + $5,500) ÷ $0.89
= $18,539
Sales quantity for C = ($11,000 + $5,800) ÷ $0.89
= $18,876
Answer:
The initial deposit should be $ 25.46
Explanation:
The Annuity formula is
P=R [1−(1+i)^-n/i]⋅(1+i)
Where
P= Initial deposit
R=Regular Withdraw amount
i=Interest rate
n=Number of years/periods
After entering corresponding values in the formula we get $25.46
so P (which is our initial deposit)=25.46
Developer's Covenants are the most restrictive of the restrictions in place for the land's use.
What developers use restrictive covenants for?
Restrictive covenants are frequently used by land developers to divide the land for residential complexes. After platting the subdivision into lots, blocks, and roadways, a property developer will put some restrictions on how the lots in the development can be used.
Do restrictive covenants expire?
Only after a covenant has been broken for at least a year without receiving any complaints is it possible to purchase restrictive covenant indemnity insurance. However, if purchased, the policy will endure forever and can frequently be transferred to new owners of the property.
Learn more about restrictive covenants: brainly.com/question/18523077
#SPJ4
You can easily apply for loans and support funds both within and outside the country. It also grants you access to funding from the government and private sector.
Answer:
Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :
a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.
b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.
c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.
