<span>The 9/11 attacks have been described as a "global symbolic event". The September 11, 2001, attacks in the northeast United States were an organized terrorist act ... In the aftermath of 9/11, public discussion of the causes of terrorism was largely .... The continued presence of US troops after the Gulf War inSaudi Arabia was ...</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
By Tom Jawetz July 22, 2019, 4:45 am
Restoring the Rule of Law Through a Fair, Humane, and Workable Immigration System
Getty/Mario Tama
New U.S. citizens gather at a naturalization ceremony, March 2018.
OVERVIEW
Policymakers must break free of the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws, and advance an immigration system that is fair, humane, and actually works.
PRESS CONTACT
For more information and updates on this topic, see CAP’s series: “Reframing the Immigration Debate.”
Introduction and summary
The immigration debate in America today is nearly as broken as the country’s immigration system itself. For too many years, the conversation has been predicated on a false dichotomy that says America can either honor its history and traditions as a nation of immigrants1 or live up to its ideals as a nation of laws by enforcing the current immigration system.2 Presented with this choice,3 supporters of immigration—people who recognize the value that immigrants bring to American society, its culture, and its economy, as well as the important role that immigrants play in the nation’s continued prosperity—have traditionally seized the mantle of defending America as a nation of immigrants.4 By doing this, however, rather than challenging the dichotomy itself, supporters have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.5 The fundamental problem with this debate is that America is, and has always been, both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Debates over a liberal immigration policy actually predate the start of the nation itself; they infused the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, America’s founding document.6
GET THE LATEST ON IMMIGRATION
Email
He balanced the power between the poor and the rich because he thought the rich held too much power.
Anderson argued that nations emerged only after three beliefs were weakened: that elite languages (like Latin) offered unique access to truth about existence; that society was naturally organized around leaders who ruled through divine dispensation; and that the origins of the world and of humankind.
What does Benedict Anderson say about nationalism?
In the book Anderson theorized the condition that led to the development of nationalism in the 18th and 19th centuries, particularly in the Americas, and famously defined the nation as an “imagined community.” The nation is imagined, according to Anderson, because it entails a sense of communion or “horizontal.
What are the causes of nationalism?
The main reasons for the emergence of Nationalism in India are:
- Political, Economic and Administrative Unification.
- Impact of Western Education.
- Development of means of Transport.
- Socio-religious reform movements.
- Development of Media, Newspaper and Magazines.
- Britishers' exploited Policies.
- National Movements outside India.
What are Anderson's 3 paradoxes of nationalism?
Anderson's best-known book, “Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism,” first published in 1983, began with three paradoxes: Nationalism is a modern phenomenon, even though many people think of their nations as ancient and eternal; it is universal (everyone has a nation),
Learn more about Anderson's paradoxes :
brainly.com/question/16960876
#SPJ4
<span>2D)Industrial Workers of the World
</span>1B) 453$3A)<span>Mother Jones, uniting workers</span>4B uniting workers
