During the New Deal, The Agricultural Adjustment Act helped farmers in Georgia by

History

2 answers:

Nostrana [21]3 years ago

8 0

The law offered farmers subsidies in exchange for limiting their production of certain crops

MissTica3 years ago

8 0

<u>C) Paying farmers to plant less cotton, which caused the price of cotton increase. </u>

The Agricultural Adjustment Act was one of the New Deal's major effort to address economic welfare in the United States. The act aimed to restore agricultural prosperity and to increase the farmer's purchasing power, damaged by the War, by increasing agricultural prices through the reduction of export surpluses and farm production.

Under this statute, the Government paid farmers money for cutting back production by about 30 percent of corn, wheat, cotton, rice, peanuts, tobacco, milk and others, in order to even the balance of supply and demand for farm commodities, so the farmers would sell their produce at a higher price and their purchasing power could be increased.

The money for these subsidies was raised by a tax on companies that bought farm products and processed them into food and clothing.

You might be interested in

What were the results of The Great Leap Forward?

aalyn [17]

Answer:

It’s A and b

Explanation:

Did some research for you. Hope this helps. Ps. The Great Leap Forward was not a success, but rather a failure.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why is development a normative project

deff fn [24]

Generally means relating to an evaluative standard

5 0

3 years ago

In this political cartoon from 1948, Stalin and Truman are engaged in a game of chess. Stalin’s pieces represent the Berlin Bloc

Vikki [24]

This <span>cartoon tells that the relationship between the USSR and the United States at this time was filled with tension, since both were fighting over the ideologies of capitalism and communism--and both sides were trying to implement their vision in Europe. </span>

4 0

3 years ago

Name three of the four main differences between a short story and a novel

weeeeeb [17]

1. Timespan
2. Plots (events that make up the story and what leads up to the resolution)
3. Conflict complexity

Why? Well, see below!

Short stories and novels are very different, and they vary in many different categories that make up why they’re called what they’re called. One difference between these two is the timespans set. In short stories, the timespan tends to be very short because as mentioned, it is a short story. The plot is kept simple, and a short solution to a problem is identified and put into action. The next difference is plot (and subplots). Plots are a huge difference between these two because in a short story, little capacity of description is provided, whereas in a novel, the plot is described more in depth. It typically is more reasonable to read a novel because the plot familiarizes itself with the reader, which results in a better comprehension of how the problem is brought about and solved. The final difference is conflict complexity. This is a big difference as well between novels and short stories because in a novel, the conflict is less timely and more descriptive. The protagonist may often encounter more conundrums in the path of solving one, which would make the general conflict more difficult to solve. If you need extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.

3 0

2 years ago

How is violence ineffective during civil rights?

aev [14]

In 1955, Reverend George Lee, vice president of the Regional Council of Negro Leadership and NAACP worker, was shot in the face and killed for urging blacks in the Mississippi Delta to vote. Although eyewitnesses saw a carload of whites drive by and shoot into Lee's automobile, the authorities failed to charge anyone. Governor Hugh White refused requests to send investigators to Belzoni, Mississippi, where the murder occurred.

7 0

2 years ago