Answer is D.
'which are yummy but really not good for you' is an example of fluff and not really necessary.
Hope this helps. - M
Answer:
Using Colin Powell's 2003 pre-war speech to the UN as a case study, this essay illustrates ways in which discourse analytic methods can serve investigations of constitutive rhetoric. Prior to the speech, Powell's reluctance to go to war and his skepticism of the need for military action in Iraq was well known. His conversion to the administration's position was key to the persuasiveness of the speech. Thus, within the speech he needed to reconstitute his ethos from doubter to advocate. The analysis focuses on how specific linguistic qualities such as modality, positioning, narrative, and evaluation assist Powell in doing so. These discourse analytic tools reveal ways in which discrete linguistic moves contribute to the constitutive work of ethos formation and re-formation.
Explanation:
Answer: they introduce the idea that the rest of the poem contrasts
Explanation:
Answer:
1. One
2. Four
3. Five
4. One and Two
5. A lawyer? this doesn't have to do with previous questions? I don't have that story then. If the tone made it sound funny then I would guess C but if the tone was more serious I would say D. The explanation for A and B aren't great so those are out for me personally but I don't have the story so this could be wrong.
Explanation:
Hope this is right I tried! I read the script!
The answer is ...
to call attention to different sections and important information.
hope this helps :)
