The correct answer is B. Citizens could lose their freedom
Explanation:
Absolute monarchy implies the monarch has unlimited or unrestricted power, which often leads to citizens' oppression and tyranny because there are no organizations or branches of government that can protect citizens. This idea is explained by Montesquieu as he states united powers exerted by the same person lead to apprehensions and lack of liberty "there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise". Moreover, Montesquieu explains an absolute monarch would create and enact tyrannical laws according to his interests "should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner." In this context, one of the consequences of this government is the loss of freedom (option B).
Answer:
According to the article, why did Karl Marx think the economic system of the world would change? He believed the system of supply and demand failed at keeping prices from changing. ... He believed competition among businesses created a system that lowered their production.
Explanation:
Answer:Manifest Destiny, in U.S. history, the supposed inevitability of the continued territorial expansion of the boundaries of the United States westward to the Pacific and beyond. Before the American Civil War (1861–65), the idea of Manifest Destiny was used to validate continental acquisitions in the Oregon Country, Texas, New Mexico, and California. The purchase of Alaska after the Civil War briefly revived the concept of Manifest Destiny, but it most evidently became a renewed force in U.S. foreign policy in the 1890s, when the country went to war with Spain, annexed Hawaii, and laid plans for an isthmian canal across Central America.
Answer:
I would be extremely upset. first and for most try to find a reason on why they stole my land. IF the government wanted to act foolish and take my land for no valid reason I would fight to get it back! after all the fifth amendment States 'nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.'
Explanation:
The legacy of world war one influenced chamberlains decision as he and other ally leaders felt Germany were harshly dealt with and that they were overly punished by the treaty of versailles