Answer:
No, because both triangles aren't a few times bigger nor smaller to eachother so they can't be that similar.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you have a graph of the function
, then you should do such transformations to get graph of the function
:
1. translate the graph of the function
3 units left, then you get the graph of the function
;
2. translate the graph of the function
4 units up, then you get the graph of the function
.
<span>−<span>1.5 <span>(<span>4 − n</span>) </span></span></span>+ <span>2.8
</span><span>Distribute:
</span><span><span><span>(<span>−1.5</span>) </span><span>(4) </span></span>+ <span><span>(<span>−1.5</span>) </span><span>(<span>−n</span>) </span></span></span>+ <span>2.8
</span><span><span>−6 </span>+ <span>1.5n </span></span>+ <span>2.8
</span>
<span>Combine Like Terms:
</span><span><span>−6 </span>+ <span>1.5n </span></span>+ <span>2.8
</span><span>(<span>1.5n</span>) </span>+ <span>(<span><span>−6 </span>+ 2.8</span><span>)
</span></span><span>1.5n </span>+ <span>−<span>3.2
</span></span>
The answer is <span>1.5n </span>+ <span>−<span>3.2</span></span>
Question (rewritten into a easier form): x¹⁰ ÷ x⁷ = 512
Answer:
Using our knowledge that x¹⁰ ÷ x⁷ = x³, we can rewrite the equation as:
x³ = 512
To work out what x is, we do ∛512 (cubed root of 512).
This will get us: 8.
Final answer:
The number is 8.
Proof:
8¹⁰ = 1073741824
8⁷ = 2097152
1073741824 ÷ 2097152 = 512
I hope this made sense and helped, if you have any questions or you think I made a mistake please let me know!
:)
