Many southern states banned the publication of abolitionist material true or false

History

1 answer:

Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The Southern States were not fond of the idea of abolishing the slavery, and they did pretty much everything in their power to counter this movement on their territory. One of the moves was to not allow the publication of abolitionist material. The reason for the banning of this material was to not allow their population to read it, thus to avoid some people to start changing their minds and be pro-abolitionist, creating a movement for it in their own territory.

You might be interested in

Which of the following was NOT an impact of the Great Famine?

Nutka1998 [239]

Hello there,

The correct answer is $\boxed{increased \ death\ and \ starvation \ in \ Ireland }$ .

<span>Southern European countries were more heavily affected than Northern Europe. And that was one of the struggle.

Hope this helps.

~Jurgen</span>

6 0

3 years ago

According to Horacio who is making plans to attack Denmark

Soloha48 [4]

Ans: To Norway to deliver a letter to Fortinbras uncle, King of Norway, to inform him about Fortinbras plans to attack Denmark and wants him to tell his nephew to stop.

3 0

3 years ago

Where did many Exodusters move after the Civil War?

NNADVOKAT [17]

The majority of the Exodusters migrated to Oklahoma, Colorado, Ohio, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, New Mexico, Arizona after the Civil war.

<h3>Who are the Exodusters?</h3>

These refers to the African American migrants that left the South Region of U.S. after the Civil War to settle in the states of Colorado, Kansas, and Oklahoma.

Hence, the majority of the Exodusters migrated to Oklahoma, Colorado, Ohio, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, New Mexico, Arizona after the Civil war.

Many southern states banned the publication of abolitionist material true or false​

Many southern states banned the publication of abolitionist material true or false