A: There is nothing free about Animal Farm. That is the whole point. Everything is recorded and used. A is wrong.
B: Boxer's response is very effective. Squealer is now in a position of power. Boxer would have been wise to say nothing, or act dumb (which he's done). B is not the best answer. Let's go on.
C: I think this is the best answer. Squealer is now on his guard. He says one thing that sounds like acceptance, but records another.
D. The point is that obedience is not enough. You have to be part of the inner circle of power and even then, you are not totally trusted. I think if you were writing an essay B and D could certainly be defended and commented upon, but your actual answer is still going to be C
C answer
Answer: Dulce et Decorum Est is by Wilfred Owen and is historical fiction. The title is significant as Dulce et Decorum Est (followed by pro patria mori) means that it is sweet and fitting to die for one's country. The title is ironic as the unlucky soul that dies to the gas attack does not die sweet or peacefully. It's just another day on the battlefields of World War I . As our speaker, another soldier on the battlefield, lets us know right away, however, "normal" isn't a word that has any meaning for the soldiers anymore. They're all mentally and physically ravaged by the exertions of battle.
And then it gets worse. Just as the men are heading home for the night, gas shells drop beside them. The soldiers scramble for their gas masks in a frantic attempt to save their own lives. Unfortunately, they don't all get to their masks in time. Our speaker watches as a member of his crew chokes and staggers in the toxic fumes, unable to save him from an excruciating certain death.
Now fast-forward. It's some time after the battle, but our speaker just can't get the sight of his dying comrade out of his head. The soldier's image is everywhere: in the speaker's thoughts, in his dreams, in his poetry. Worst of all, our speaker can't do anything to help the dying soldier.
Bitterly, the speaker finally addresses the people at home who rally around the youth of England, and urge them to fight for personal glory and national honor. He wonders how they can continue to call for war. If they could only witness the physical agony war creates – or even experience the emotional trauma that the speaker's going through now – the speaker thinks they might change their views. In the speaker's mind, there's noting glorious or honorable about death. Or, for that matter, war itself.
Explanation: 100% on it
Answer:
Personally I thought it was really confusing. It had a bunch of characters and it was hard to follow at some points because of the language used by Shakespeare.
Explanation:
yeah
Answer:
I am 90% sure the answer is A or it could also be B but i am sure it is A.
Explanation:
Hope this helped im sorry if it was wrong hope you have a good day :)
Answer:1. whomever (objective)
Jack hits the ball to whomever has a mitt. (Indirect object)
2. whoever (nominative)
Whoever has a glove can play.
3. who (nominative)
Who is at the door?
4. whom (objective)
Whom did you see when you opened the door?
5. which (nominative/objective)
Which is my slice of pie? (Nominative). The choice boiled down to which came first. (Objective)
6. that (nominative/objective)
That is never an option. (Nominative). I don't think much of that. (Objective)
