1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Doss [256]
3 years ago
15

was the struggle over slavery or the disagreement over states rights the main cause of the Civil War?

History
1 answer:
yKpoI14uk [10]3 years ago
8 0
The disagreement of state rights.
You might be interested in
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
3 years ago
Jewish independence was brought about by the family of the _
Gnoma [55]
Maccabees, jewish independence was brought about by the family of the maccabees
4 0
3 years ago
Do you<br> think the United Nations is a good thing or bad thing? Explain.
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

Bad

Explanation:

such as policy, ideology, equality of representation, administration, ability to enforce rulings, and ideological bias. lack of the body's efficacy, rampant anti-Semitism, appeasement, collusion, promotion of globalism, inaction, abuse of power by nations exerting general control over the assembly, a number of legislative decisions seen as abandonment of, among other things, the prevention of armed conflict clause(s) detailed in the Charter of the United Nations, corruption, a total lack of efficacy in both pre-emptive measures and de-escalation of existing conflicts which have ranged from social disputes to all-out wars, and misappropriation of resources. They are a disgrace.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between the Renaissance and the Dark Ages
ivanzaharov [21]
The renaissance means re awaking while the dark age was the deterioration of democratic and cultural and economic ways   
5 0
3 years ago
In 1935, the elderly, physically disabled, and orphans began receiving government benefits following the passage of the
In-s [12.5K]
The social security act
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • John Locke would have agreed with all of the following statements EXCEPT: <br><br>      
    11·2 answers
  • Match the following examples of resistance to social change to their definitions
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST explains why President Lyndon Johnson, subsequent to President Kennedy’s assassination, did not have
    7·2 answers
  • What is the Peace Corps?
    6·2 answers
  • in what way does jefferson emphasize that the colonists complaints are against the king of england not against the british peopl
    13·1 answer
  • Who wants to make a change today​
    15·2 answers
  • HOW did kahlo’s worsening health affect her art
    7·1 answer
  • Why dont people like me
    6·1 answer
  • Civil war propaganda
    15·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!