What advantages did the spanish have over the indigenous people of the americas?

1 answer:

4 0

First of all, the Spanish (along with the rest of the large European countries at the time) had guns and other military technology. With the advantage of having gunpowder, the Spanish were able to relatively easily conquer the indigenous peoples in the Americas. Another point is the Spanish military training; the American civilizations had no military training that matched the strict codes of the European countries, so the precision of the Spanish helped them conquer.

You might be interested in

many _______ leaders thought the government spent too much money and was a threat to individual liberty

lorasvet [3.4K]

Many democratic leaders <span />

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Arrange the events in chronological order

muminat

No events were provided?

8 0

2 years ago

1. Conflicts in what two nations led Truman to make his speech?

pav-90 [236]

It was <span>Greece and Turkey.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes why the city of Jerusalem was such a contested territory in the 20th century

Nimfa-mama [501]

Well, you did not provide the answer choices but hopefully this answer helps you. The reason why Jerusalem has been such a contested territory is because so many religions have tried to claim Jerusalem as their own holy city. They have fought for control of the city throughout the ages. Such religions include Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Roman Catholicism, and more.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How is an oligarchy similar to a monarchy? Both grant political rights to men only. Both give military leaders most of the power

lozanna [386]

The correct answer is D. Both limit the number of people that exercise.

Explanation:

In oligarchy and monarchy, the number of people that hold power is limited. Indeed, in monarchy, the power is mainly exerted by the king/queen or monarch. Moreover, this power is passed to the heir, who is usually the son/daughter of the monarch.

Similarly, in an oligarchy, citizens do not hold power, but this is exerted by a small group of people, who are part of a dominant social class and exert power according to their interests. This means in monarchy power is exercised by one individual, while in aristocracy the power is exercised by a few privileged people. According to this, one difference is that "both limit the number of people that exercise".

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers