Answer:
Diverse
Explanation:
showing a great deal of variety; very different.
The Supreme Court has the legal right to involve itself, because of large reasons. For the first reason, The race was tight enough, and no matter what, one of them was going to win. Bush was already 'winning', and so there really wasn't a point of recounting. Also, another reason is that a country cannot be without a leader. If this continued, the US will not have been following it's guideline (if they continue the previous president until finish counting), or will be leaderless. Also, the Supreme Court is there to regulate rules, and at this point, it is just exercising its rights.
hope this helps
Good public speaker and was very convincing. Made the army follow him, so he had all the power
Seward’s Folly refers to the "<span>(C) United States’ purchase of Alaska," since this deal was made by William Seward, and was seen by many at the time as being a waste of money. </span>
Answer:
Provided a dual system of congressional representation.
Explanation:
Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth). In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population.