The Triple Entente was victorious because the <span>United States provided monetary assistance without interfering in battle.
The Triple Entente was an organization consisting of three countries - France, United Kingdom, and the Russian Empire. It meant that these countries were allies in the coming wars (such as WWI). They were greatly aided by the US, which supplied army, weapons, as well as money.
</span>
Teen: I wouldn't want the martial law back, because first off; that means we are undergoing a war on the U.S. soil, and second off, that means the President (being Trump) can over ride the other branches of the government, making him our "ruler" of sorts, and can form laws that could be normally harmful towards the economy and citizens of the U.S.
Answer:Many Social Darwinists embraced laissez-faire capitalism and racism. ... The ideas of Social Darwinism pervaded many aspects of American society in the Gilded Age, including policies that affected immigration, imperialism, and public health.
Explanation:
Answer:
Infilterated- Spread into or invade (A tissue or a organ)
Virginia plan- Unsuccessfully proposed at the Constitutional Convention
New Jersey- was a proposal for the structure of the U.S. federal government put forward by William Paterson at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Delegate- A person sent or authorized
3/5 Compromise-slavery- The compromise counted three-fifths of each state's slave population toward that state's total population for the purpose of apportioning the House of Representatives
The great Compromise- was an agreement made between large and small states which partly defined the representation each state would have under the United States Constitution, as well as in legislature.
Articles of Confederation- The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was an agreement among the 13 original states of the United States of America that served as its first constitution.
The Dred Scott decision was the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on March 6, 1857, that having lived in a free state and territory did not entitle an enslaved person, Dred Scott, to his freedom. In essence, the decision argued that, as someone's property, Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court.
