1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
3 years ago
13

What inference can be made about the prince from this dialogue? A.he is a good friend to both the capulets and the montagues. B.

he is an inexperienced ruler who has no control over the citizens. C.he is angry with both families for fighting in the streets again. D.he is unconcerned about the fighting among his subjects.
English
1 answer:
skad [1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C .He is angry with both families for fighting in the streets again.

You might be interested in
Which two methods of characterization does the author
zlopas [31]

Answer:

actions and dialogue

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Act III, scene ii of Julius Caesar, who gave their reasons for why Caesar
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

B. Brutus and Antony

Explanation:

brutus said

caesar was ambitious

Romans would live as slaves under Caesar’s leadership

word czar or tzar come from the word caesar

sparknotes wikipedia

3 0
1 year ago
In what organizational pattern do you compare and contrast subjects as a whole?
kipiarov [429]
There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers. 

1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme 
     -p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah. 
P2- theme
     -p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point, 
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes. 

2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme. 

3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.

Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing. 

Good luck
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can u guys help please
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

f

Explanation:

developing a character through description

3 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP FAST!
Veseljchak [2.6K]
The answer you are wanting is A, have a nice day!
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the plural of leaf Use a dictionary if necessary.
    5·2 answers
  • Nonfiction writing leans heavily on the writer's imagination and fantasy through the use of argumentative prose. true false user
    13·2 answers
  • 1. Describe one moment in "The Tell-Tale Heart" where you think the narrator does not "know he was doing what was wrong."
    12·1 answer
  • In Wordsworth's poem "The Solitary Reaper," what activity is the young woman engaged in? A. harvesting wheat B. studying the sky
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE HELP!!! THIS IS DUE TODAY!
    13·1 answer
  • Rudy's rowdy robots rewrite the story title with correct capital letters
    15·2 answers
  • 11. Making sure that every sentence in a paragraph connects with the others refers to
    7·1 answer
  • Fran has been struggling with the tasks she has to accomplish over the next few weeks: homework due the next day (Tuesday), a Fr
    7·1 answer
  • Could anyone write two sentences containing compound phrases with pronouns. (Use a nominative case pronoun in one sentence and a
    8·1 answer
  • Plss answer I need it now ty​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!