1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tamiku [17]
3 years ago
5

Which best explains why the government tried to prevent the new york times from publishing articles on the vietnam war? - the ar

ticles praised the presidents actions
-the articles criticized the military
-the articles threatened national security
-the articles supported communist
History
2 answers:
pashok25 [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The article threatened national security

Explanation:

The Government of the united states tried to prevent the New York times from publishing articles on the Vietnam War on the basis that the article threatened national security.

the government said some of the contents found in the article could cause a dis stabilization of the country because not everyone approved of the involvement of the united states of America in the Vietnam war and therefore allowing the article to be published threatened National security at large

maxonik [38]3 years ago
5 0

The government used the argument that the articles threatened national security.

You might be interested in
Business Owner. Imagine yourself as the owner of a large steel factory or fabric shop. You are invited
dangina [55]

Answer:

1.  Against - alcohol is a big business, if it's prohibited then a large portion of businesses will close  down

2. For - Some employees won't be irresponsible about work due to being addicted to alcohol

3. For - this will give my business a chance to compete more and make more money

6 0
2 years ago
Germany was an ally of Russia true or false
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

the answer is true

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. a smaller group of people<br>​
Korvikt [17]

Answer:

handful?...

Explanation: specify what you mean

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Missouri Compromise spark or ignited sectionalism within the United States.
mote1985 [20]

Sectionalism was very much a part of the Missouri Compromise, with two main sections of the country -- North vs. South -- divided over the issue of slavery.

The Missouri Compromise (1820) admitted Missouri into the Union as a slave state with Maine being added at the same time as a free state, to keep the balance of slave and free states equal.  The Missouri Compromise also prohibited any future slave states north of the latitude line 36 1/2 degrees north of the equator in territories of the Louisiana Purchase, with the exception of Missouri (north of that line) being admitted as a slave state.

A couple decades later, that sectional debate was sparked still further by the acquisition of lands from Mexico after the Mexican-American War.  The Mexican Cession was the large region of land that Mexico ceded to the United States in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848.  It included territory that would later become the states of California, Nevada, Utah, and parts of what would become Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.  The Mexican Cession reignited tension on the issue of slave-holding states vs. free states.   Since the Missouri Compromise had specified only the Louisiana Purchase lands with its  36 1/2 degrees latitude dividing line, new debate arose over whether territories in the Mexican Cession territory would be slave or free states.

6 0
3 years ago
1. Read the excerpt from the textbook.
n200080 [17]

The correct answer is B) provide fair compensation for the owners for any property taken.

I<em>n order to exercise this power, the government must provide fair compensation for the owners for any property taken. </em>

The United States government has the right to own private land for public purposes only. It is called the Eminent Domain. With this power, the government can take private land for public uses providing fair compensation for the owners for any property taken. The government can use the property for improving public services such as the construction of roads, dams, hospitals, among others.  


8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the primary aim of usa patriot act of 2001
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the founding fathers set up three branches of government
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these cities is closer to the epicenter of the earthquake
    5·1 answer
  • What were some of the main goals of the Second New Deal? (Select all that apply)
    10·2 answers
  • Guys I need the right answer ASAP! Is the answer
    9·1 answer
  • Why does Douglass feel that suffrage for the black man is so important?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the cold war?
    14·2 answers
  • How did Benjamin Franklin help the development of U.S. money?
    10·1 answer
  • Which practice was a means the federal government used to safeguard blacks' civil rights during congressional Reconstruction?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the Catholic Church believe scientific inquiry would undermine its authority?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!