Answer:
Maharana Pratap was a brave and patriotic Rajput with love for his motherland. He was an egoistic but responsible person. He Could have finished him self instead of going into exile but for the sake of his family's responsibility he struggles and survives.
Explanation:
The type of dwellings that a certain group of people has can tell a lot about the society of that particular group. In this case we have the Karankawas that had homes easy for transportation, and the Caddos that had permanent homes of heavier build.
We can conclude that the Karankawas were nomadic people that were constantly on the move. They have lived in areas that were not suitable for agriculture, so they were hunting and gathering in order to get the needed food. This means that the societies were not large, but consisted of smaller number of people, and the groups were made out of the extended family or few families.
The Caddos, on the other hand, were having sedentary life according to their dwellings. They most probably lived in area suitable for agriculture, so they produced their own food, thus having no need to change their location of living. The societies were larger and more complex, as it was possible with the surplus of food, but also practical for development, and defense in case it was needed.
War on the Western Front from late 1914 to most of 1918 can be characterized as a stalemate during which little ground was gained. Thus, Option 1 is the correct choice.
<h3>What is a stalemated conflict?</h3>
Stalemate describes a situation in battle wherein neither side can alternate the front lines dramatically regardless of how tough it tries. WWII in no way reached a stalemate in Europe.
The warring parties alternated offensive and protective campaigns, however, they had constantly been moving. World War I epitomized a stalemate.
Therefore, the War on the Western Front from late 1914 to most of 1918 can be characterized as a stalemate during which little ground was gained. Thus, Option 1 is the correct choice.
Learn more about stalemate conflict here:
brainly.com/question/20719044
#SPJ1
Hey there,
Your question states: <span>Which aspect of Charybdis frightens the men more? How does the poet’s language convey this fearfulness? Well, it really all depends on what "Charybdis" is saying to the men. This would be a reason why the men would be frighten. So maybe he were to say things like there death could come to life, or things in that sort. And based on this poet's language, this would convey that anything could be fearless to anyone, it just really depends on what you say and on how you say it.
Hope this helps.</span>
