<span>Early people of the Americas used a combination of animals to further their exploration and expansion into new territories. Some populations used horses and oxen as food sources, and did much of their travel on foot, bringing only what they could carry. Others settled in towns, where food and supplies could be purchased or traded.</span>
Answer:
Marshall plan was partially created to stop the spread of communism while the Molotov plan was encouraging the spreading of communism and thus this lead to the main difference between the two plans.
Explanation:
Marshall plan was partially created to stop the spread of communism while the Molotov plan was encouraging the spreading of communism and thus this lead to the main difference between the two plans. Money from the Soviet Union could be used to prop up communist states in the same way that the money from the Marshall Plan was attempting to rebuild western-style democracies.
The correct answer is True
Rationalism was a very important philosophical current in Modernity. As a conception of philosophical knowledge, rationalism began to take shape during the Renaissance, but its early origins can go back to Greek philosophy, with the Platonic idealist theses and the conception of the principle of causality.
The main objective of rationalism is to theorize the way of knowing about human beings, not accepting any empirical element as a source of true knowledge. For the rationalists, all the ideas we have originate from pure rationality, which also imposes an innate conception, that is, that the ideas have innate origins in the human being, being born with us in our intellect and being used and discovered by the people who they make better use of reason. Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz are considered rationalist philosophers.
Answer:
It conflicts with it because the establishment clause prohibits the state from endorsing a specific religion or choosing it as an official religion of the state or from establishing their own religion. Although they personally have the right to free speech in being religious, they don't have it as representatives of the state because states are secular and have no religion. All people are people of the state, not just those that are related to the majority religion
