Hey! some of the reasons to save distressed wildlife would be- For the health of our ecosystem for medicinal values for recreation for economic value for aesthetical value for social-cultural value hope this helps! good luck.
have – there are two people, so it is <u>plural</u>
are – it refers to a cousin and the narrator, so <u>plural </u>
are – Meeta is singular, but sisters are <u>plural</u>, therefore answer must be used for plural noun
was – even though the jury is consisting of the more than one person, t<u>hey are treated as the singular group</u>
by the rules, both are or is can be used, however, are sounds more natural with the plural noun "books"
was – <u>it refers to the name of the book</u> which is <em>The Midnight's Children</em> not the nook itself, so it is <u>singular </u>
was – it<u> refers to the quality which is singular,</u> not the sarees
is – <u>it refers to the size, a singular</u>, not the curtains
is –<u> it refers to the sum</u>, which is a <u>singular </u>noun
was – each of the candidates is <u>singular</u>
have – Mohit and the friends are <u>plural </u>number of people
is –<u> it refers to the distance</u>, which is a <u>singular </u>noun
was – a women is a <u>singular</u>
<u>This one is not the full question</u>, the full one should be "<em>Neither the teacher nor his students (is/are) in the class</em>" The answer is are because it refers to the <u>plural</u> number of people with teacher and the student<u>s</u>
was – it refers to <u>only one person</u>, as it says "<em>one </em>of the boys", therefore it is <u>singular</u>
Both Justice Fortas and Justice Black have made reference to the first
amendment, that which contains the rights regarding freedom of speech
and expression. Justice Fortas and Justice Black both spoke about this
in regards to the equality of people in the United States.
I'm sorry, but this question doesn't make any sense? Could you explain it a bit? You should also consider if this question fits in the subject English? Maybe better in math?
