I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the first option. The step of the <span>critical analysis process you would express your personal opinion about whether or not an artwork is successful is evaluation. This is solely based on how you see the work, how you perceive and understand it.</span>
Answer:
The answer to this question is option A: "he wanted to show the atrocities of war and evils of fascism".
Explanation:
Picasso wanted to show show the horrors of the war, as experienced by the civil population, to the world. He wanted to show that war has devastating effects and by this turn people's opinions against the war. The bombing was also done by the fascists so the painting can be seen as a symbol for the fights against the fascists.
The speed of weaving does not affect the quality.
Answer:
no, it portrays people differently however the article wants (perfect, pretty, ugly, dirty, gross, etc.), it sets unfair and impossible standards for normal people, and it doesn't show the truth (journalism is supposed to be all about the truth)
