<span>Zahra
is an employee at colorz inc. she loves gossiping about her colleagues
during office hours, which causes her to receive a reprimand by her
supervisor, dan. a few days later, dan fires gunther, another
subordinate, from work for a similar reason. the employees reporting to
dan are most likely to conclude he demonstrates a lack of outcome fairness in
dealing with employees who gossip at work.
</span><span>Outcome fairness is a judgment that the consequences given to employees are just.</span>
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
DOT stands for the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. It is the publication which was produced by the Department of Labor of the United States of America for the working people that helped the employers, the government officials, and the other workforce development professionals in order to define over 
different types of work from 
to the late 
s.
But now, due to the advancement in technologies and change in the nature of job of many works the previous publication was replaced by the new Occupational Information Network which suits with todays technology and development in the working conditions. It is shortly known as the O*NET.
Hence the answer is TRUE.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
b) because it allows specialization, which increases total output
Explanation:
Specialization is when a nation or individual concentrates its productive efforts on producing a limited variety of goods. It oftentimes has to forgo producing other goods and relies on obtaining those other goods through trade.
Answer:
Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Explanation:
Old Net profit margin = Net income/ Revenue
= $10,600/$205,000
= 5.170731707%
Old ROE = Net profit margin*Asset turnover*Equity multiplier
= 0.0517*1.33*1.75
= 12.03487805%
New net income = $10,600 + $10,250
= $20,850
New net profit margin = $20,850/$205,000
= 10.17073171%
New ROE = 0.1017*1.33*1.75
= 23.67237805%
Change in ROE = New ROE – Old ROE
= 23.67237805% - 12.03487805%
= 11.6375%
Therefore, Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
