Creating a drain on the food,clothing and shelter of American Indians.
Hope it helps :)
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
<span>Near vs Minnesota</span>
In this Supreme Court case, the court
ruled that the First Amendment protected free speech and that the prior rulings
were a violation of freedom of the Press which is protected in the
Constitution. As a result, the court overturned thr prior conviction
Answer:
The fighting during the war had mostly been fought in Southern territory
Explanation:
The fighting during the war had mostly been fought in Southern territory.The South has been devastated, and the people had their home and communities destroyed.
