<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Business cycles are distinguished as having four particular stages: top, trough, compression, and development. </em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>Business cycle changes happen around a long haul development pattern</em> and are typically estimated by considering the development pace of genuine total national output.
<em>Three Ways Monetary and Fiscal Policy Change It.</em> The business cycle is brought about by the powers of organic market, the accessibility of capital, and assumptions regarding what's to come.
<em>This is what causes every one of the four periods of the blast and bust cycle.</em>
The answer to this depends on what sources you are using, but some sources state that people identify lies only 55% of the time!
That's very little, considering that 50% is the chance level - this number would be the one used if we could never really use our intuition to guess correctly. For example if we guessed that every second person randomly lies that would give us the "chance level" of 50 %. (if exactly half of the people lied).
And in real life, we can tell 55% of the time if people are lying - this means we are slightly better than chance.
We can conclude from this that we should never trust our intuition about whether people lie or not!
Answer:
Power was shared between a military chief and a chief who oversaw tribal affairs.(D)
Explanation:
Took the test in edge
Answer:
encoding
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various neurologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is most likely due to a failure in encoding. Encoding is known as the first step when creating a new memory, it changes the item that you are observing into data that is stored in the brain to later be remembered from short-term or long-term memory. Such an example is the one in the question, where you are looking at a five-dollar bill and converting the data into memory, which is what most likely failed in this situation.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
C. This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
This would not be considered an example of plagiarism. In this example, the student takes some ideas from the original source of Reigeluth and Schwartz (1989). However, he mentions the source of such ideas in his text, while providing the relevant information that is needed for citations, such as author and date. He also rewrites the ideas he is borrowing in his own words.
