1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
3 years ago
15

According to Clinton, what were two ways that NAFTA would affect United States

History
2 answers:
Bogdan [553]3 years ago
7 0
First, it caused the loss of some 700,000 jobs as production moved to Mexico.

Second, NAFTA strengthened the ability of U.S.
otez555 [7]3 years ago
5 0

According to Clinton, the two ways that NAFTA would affect United States were increased jobs and lower prices.  

According to Bill Clinton, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) would result in increased jobs and lower prices.  

The North American Free Trade Agreement is an agreement signed by Canada, Mexico, and the United States in order to create a trilateral trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, 1994.

You might be interested in
What was one result of the rapid growth of us cities in the early 20the centuey?
spin [16.1K]
An era known as the 'roaring 20s' .

Please vote my answer branliest! Thanks.
4 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply.
pshichka [43]

<em>Syncopation</em> "is the technique of placing the accent on a normally weak beat" <em>and</em> "is characterized by a rhythmical succession of single tones producing a distinct musical phrase or idea"

<em>I hope this helps </em>

7 0
3 years ago
!!!!!!! need the correct answer please ,if you dont know dont answer .!!!!!!!!!
dlinn [17]
They came from Europe
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Athenians government was one in which all citizens gathered in the marketplace to
zmey [24]
Direct democracy

EX:

oligarchy doesn’t make sense
Doesn’t sound like a monarchy
Definitely isn’t a dictatorship.
7 0
2 years ago
Why did the British want to win the Battle of El Alamein?
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

im asumming because they had things britains wanted or for land control. You see back then it was always about being the bigger better land. So the fight for power was a thristy one. If a place had something that other places did not obviously their might be a dispute based on that.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does Paine say about the argument that Britain has defended the colonies in the past?
    5·2 answers
  • What school did George t. Sampson go to ?
    8·2 answers
  • Which name for the period between World War II and the 1990s best
    10·1 answer
  • When a chemical reaction takes place, the number of atoms of each element in the reactants
    6·1 answer
  • Were Early Christians were treated well in the Roman Empire. False or True
    15·2 answers
  • Q 3 confederacy strategy
    14·1 answer
  • Did Harry Truman do the right<br> thing in dropping Atom<br> Bombs on Japan in 1945?
    10·2 answers
  • William Penn’s Frame of Government did which of the following? 30 POINTS
    11·2 answers
  • In a(n)<br> a king or queen is subject to no one else and to no law.
    12·1 answer
  • I need to know more about history
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!