Answer:
Both the Western Empire at large and Rome's unimportance to the East is highlighted by the ease with which they ceded Italy and the surrounding areas to the Germanic invaders. The split of the Empire was due in part to the difficulty of governing an empire as large as the Roman's with any kind of continuity. The network of public Roman roads covered over 120,000 km, and it greatly assisted the free movement of armies, people, and goods across the empire. Roads were also a very visible indicator of the power of Rome, and they indirectly helped unify what was a vast melting pot of cultures, races, and institutions.
Explanation:
I wanted to help you since you had answered my questions.
If its wrong than I'm really sorry.
:)
Answer:
Every place is ran by J.D Rockefellers Standard Oil Company.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h3>Rule of man and divine rights of kings emphasizes that all powers and sovereignty rests in the hands of a single person.</h3>
Explanation:
Rule of man and divine rights of kings emphasizes that all powers and sovereignty rests in the hands of a single person. When a single person has full discretion and absolute sovereignty over the people, power can be misused or, in most cases, dictatorship may arise.
People began to <u>understand the need of power sharing and representative government</u> as divine rights of kings and rule of man did a lot of harm to the people. <u>Individual rights, freedom of speech and expression and equality</u> developed within the minds of the people with time.
Thus, people demanded for rule of law <u>where every individual had equal rights and freedoms under the codified laws.</u> The kings were also subjective to such laws and could not exercise discretionary powers over anyone under the rule of law.
The previous section described the parts of a case in order to make it easier to read and identify the pertinent information that you ... The judges certainly don't care if you brief, so long as you competently practice the law.
Unstable ... or under the rule of a dictator ... or both.
The idea of the term "banana republic" is that the small nation is economically dependent on one product (such as bananas) and is typically not truly a "republic." The term "banana republic" was introduced in 1901 by American author O.Henry to describe Honduras and other Latin American countries that were being exploited by corporations like the United Fruit Company.
