The American colonists were all similar in several ways. The
colonists had their own self government system and the people governing were
chosen mostly from farmers that had their own lands and also voted for the provincial
government. All the colonies were similar in the fact that all white men had
the voting rights and most black men were slaves. All the colonies were rich
and had good amount of food and so their growth rate was also very high.
I would know about John Marshall. He was a federalist supreme court chief justice. He gave more power to the government by taking a loose construction of the Constitution. So basically he said, "If it doesnt say we (Fed Gov't) cant do it, then we can)".
<span>Know about these Court cases </span>
<span>Gibbons V. Ogden </span>
<span>McCullough V. Maryland </span>
<span>Fletcher V. Peck </span>
<span>Cohens V. Virginia </span>
<span>Barron V. Baltimore- this one is hard to find, so basically it just said that because the Bill of Rights was a Federal decision, it didnt apply to the states. </span>
<span>The rest are really easy to find out about, and you could type in John Marshall and it would probably give you all of these. </span>
<span>http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/served/marshall.html </span>
<span>http://www.lawnix.com/cases/gibbons-ogden.html- heres gibbons/ogden</span>
Answer:
On June 4, 1968, popular Democratic Partypresidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy waited all day for the election results to come in from the Democratic primary in California. At 11:30 p.m., Kennedy, his wife Ethel, and the rest of his entourage left the Royal Suite of the Ambassador Hotel and headed downstairs
Explanation:
Many tribes also took legal action to prevent strip mining or spraying of pesticides on Indian lands. The best known of all Indian Power<span> groups was the </span>American<span> Indian</span>Movement<span> (AIM), formed by a group of Chippewas in Minneapolis in 1966 to protest alleged police brutality.</span>
The best historical skill is "though the eyes" of Roman Empire. In other words how did the Roman people react to brutal violence of hurting one another in battles of parties-of 2 sides.
Using this historical skill the historian would interpret the reasons as to why the Roman Empire could allow battle fights. In the eyes of Roman Empire:fighting for power, win, justice, challenge for the Empire -and prosperity.
